
Tagged PDF SAMPLE: Lang En
SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (lang-en) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.
- File
- PDF · Tagged PDF Sample · 1 page
- Use case
- PDF editor testingEditor testing· Conversion set
Find files, editable templates and browser test targets by what you need to make or test. Explore complete business kits for connected records, templates and expected results.
Page 184 of 221; 24 results per page.

SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (lang-en) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.

SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (link-structure) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.

SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (list-structure) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.

SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (pdfua-note) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.

SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (reading-order) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.

SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (role-map) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.

SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (table-structure) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.

SAMPLE PDF documenting tagged/accessibility intent (toc-outline) in specs: bookmark outline present; not a full PDF/UA export.

A run abandoned after the third assertion with a Bail out! line, leaving five of the planned eight assertions unreported. The run is a failure even though only one assertion said not ok, and a consumer must not report 2/3 passing as a 67% pass rate.

Free-form # comment lines interleaved with assertions, including a trailing summary block. Comments carry no result and must never shift assertion numbering, which is exactly what a parser counting lines instead of ok/not ok tokens gets wrong.

A whole suite declined in a single line: a zero-length plan with a SKIP directive and a reason. It is a valid, complete TAP stream containing no assertions, and a consumer must report it as skipped rather than as an empty pass or a parse error.

Two failing assertions, each followed by an indented YAML diagnostic block carrying the expected and actual values and a file/line location. The block is where every useful failure message in TAP lives, and it is the part naive line-based parsers throw away.

Two subtests, each an indented TAP stream with its own plan, rolled up into two top-level assertions. Flatten it and you count seven assertions instead of two; ignore the indentation and the nested failure is counted twice.

Every assertion in this stream says ok, but the plan promised ten and only eight arrived: the signature of a runner that crashed after its last reported assertion. A consumer that only counts not ok lines calls this a clean pass.

The canonical TAP shape: a version line, a leading plan, then six passing assertions in order. Anything a TAP consumer does with a real stream it must do with this one first.

Two assertions marked # SKIP with a reason, alongside a genuine failure. Skipped assertions are written as ok, so counting ok lines reports 5 passes when only 3 tests actually ran.

Two failing assertions marked # TODO, meaning they are known-unfinished work rather than regressions. A TODO failure must not fail the run, so a consumer that treats every not ok as a build breaker turns this green run red.

Assertion 2 is marked TODO but reports ok: an unexpected success, which means the feature landed and the marker is now stale. Harnesses such as prove report this as a bonus rather than a pass, and dropping the distinction lets stale TODOs accumulate forever.

The same stream with the plan at the end, which is what a harness emits when it does not know the test count up front. A consumer that requires a leading plan rejects a perfectly valid stream.

TAP 14 with an explicit version line and a pragma inside a subtest. Consumers pinned to version 13 either reject the stream outright or ignore the pragma, so this file separates the two behaviours.

Three directory records with distinct modes, one of which - tree/empty/ - has no members underneath it and therefore exists only because the record does. A reader that synthesises directories from member paths alone silently loses it, and loses the 0750 and 0700 modes on the other two.

An empty tar is not a zero-byte file - it is exactly two 512-byte blocks of zeros, the end-of-archive marker with nothing in front of it. Writers that emit nothing at all produce a file most readers reject, which is the bug this 1024-byte file exists to distinguish.

A FIFO, a character device and a block device, each a header with no data blocks and with the device numbers in the devmajor/devminor fields. Unprivileged extraction cannot create the two device nodes, so the correct behaviour is to skip them with a warning rather than to abort the whole archive or to create empty regular files in their place.

GNU tar's extension of the same header, identified by its own magic: long names get their own 'L' record, oversized numeric fields switch to base-256, and sparse files get an in-header map. All three archives in this group hold byte-identical members with identical ownership and modification times, so any other difference a reader reports between them comes from the header encoding alone.
We use Google Analytics and show ads via Adsterra. Non-essential cookies and ad scripts run only after you allow the matching categories. See our cookie policy.