Skip to content
Novus Examples

Explore the test library

Find files, editable templates and browser test targets by what you need to make or test. Explore complete business kits for connected records, templates and expected results.

5297 results

Page 66 of 221; 24 results per page.

Show the canonical directory
Preview of EML: multipart/alternative With an Empty text/plain Part
eml
618 B
Actual file preview for EML: multipart/alternative With an Empty text/plain Part

EML: multipart/alternative With an Empty text/plain Part

A zero-length text/plain alternative next to a real HTML part: the shape produced by senders that add a plain part only to satisfy spam filters. Anything preferring plain text renders a blank message unless it falls back when the chosen part is empty.

File
EML · Mime
Use case
Email parsingError handling+1· Conversion set
Preview of EML: multipart/alternative With Three Representations
eml
901 B
Actual file preview for EML: multipart/alternative With Three Representations

EML: multipart/alternative With Three Representations

The same release notes as plain text, Markdown (RFC 7763) and HTML, ordered least-faithful first. Most selectors only know the plain/HTML pair, so this is the fixture that shows whether an unfamiliar middle part is skipped or mistaken for the body.

File
EML · Mime
Use case
Email parsingConversion testing· Conversion set
Preview of EML: multipart/digest With Implicit message/rfc822 Parts
eml
845 B
Actual file preview for EML: multipart/digest With Implicit message/rfc822 Parts

EML: multipart/digest With Implicit message/rfc822 Parts

Two complete messages carried in a multipart/digest, neither part declaring a Content-Type. RFC 2046 makes the default message/rfc822 inside a digest instead of the usual text/plain, so a parser that hardcodes the text default renders raw headers as body text.

File
EML · Mime
Use case
Email parsingConversion testing· Conversion set
Preview of EML: multipart/related Root Selected by start=
eml
1002 B
Actual file preview for EML: multipart/related Root Selected by start=

EML: multipart/related Root Selected by start=

The related container's root is the second part, named by the start= parameter, with an image sitting first. A reader that assumes the first part is always the root displays a PNG as the message body.

File
EML · Mime
Use case
Email parsingConversion testing· Conversion set
Preview of EML: multipart/related With an Unreferenced Image Part
eml
1.3 KB
Actual file preview for EML: multipart/related With an Unreferenced Image Part

EML: multipart/related With an Unreferenced Image Part

Two inline image parts, only one of them referenced by the HTML. Attachment counters disagree loudly on this shape: some report one attachment, some two, some none, and the answer changes what a user sees in the message list.

File
EML · Mime
Use case
Email parsingConversion testing· Conversion set
Preview of EML: References Chain With Repeated Message-IDs
eml
689 B
Actual file preview for EML: References Chain With Repeated Message-IDs

EML: References Chain With Repeated Message-IDs

A References header that lists the same two Message-IDs twice, in a repeating order: what a client produces when it appends without checking. A threader that treats the chain as a literal path builds a cycle or reports a depth of four for a two-deep thread.

File
EML · Threading
Use case
Email parsingError handling+1· Conversion set
Preview of EML: References Folded Before Every Message-ID
eml
833 B
Actual file preview for EML: References Folded Before Every Message-ID

EML: References Folded Before Every Message-ID

An eight-deep References chain folded so each Message-ID sits on its own line. There is no comma between msg-ids in this header, so a parser that splits on the line break rather than unfolding first ends up with ids that carry a leading space.

File
EML · Headers
Use case
Email parsingConversion testing· Conversion set
Preview of EML: Reply Whose Parent Message Does Not Exist
eml
625 B
Actual file preview for EML: Reply Whose Parent Message Does Not Exist

EML: Reply Whose Parent Message Does Not Exist

The immediate parent named by In-Reply-To was never delivered, but its grandparent is in the References chain. A threader has to fall back up the chain instead of orphaning the message: the everyday case after a deleted or filtered message.

File
EML · Threading
Use case
Email parsingError handling+1· Conversion set
Preview of EML: Reply With In-Reply-To and No References
eml
517 B
Actual file preview for EML: Reply With In-Reply-To and No References

EML: Reply With In-Reply-To and No References

A reply that declares its parent only through In-Reply-To. Threading code that builds ancestry from References alone files this message as a new thread root, splitting a conversation in the message list.

File
EML · Threading
Use case
Email parsingConversion testing· Paired fixture
Preview of EML: Reply With References and No In-Reply-To
eml
517 B
Actual file preview for EML: Reply With References and No In-Reply-To

EML: Reply With References and No In-Reply-To

The same reply expressed the other way round: a References chain with no In-Reply-To. Together with its twin it isolates which of the two headers a threading implementation actually reads, since either alone is sufficient under RFC 5322.

File
EML · Threading
Use case
Email parsingConversion testing· Paired fixture
Preview of EML: RFC 2047 Subject Mixing Three Charsets
eml
616 B
Actual file preview for EML: RFC 2047 Subject Mixing Three Charsets

EML: RFC 2047 Subject Mixing Three Charsets

A single Subject built from three encoded-words in three charsets and two encodings. RFC 2047 allows this, and it is what happens when a subject is quoted through several mail systems, so each word has to be decoded on its own terms.

File
EML · Headers
Use case
Email parsingEncoding detection+1· Conversion set
Preview of EML: RFC 2231 Continuation Filename With size and creation-date
eml
886 B
Actual file preview for EML: RFC 2231 Continuation Filename With size and creation-date

EML: RFC 2231 Continuation Filename With size and creation-date

The conformant answer to non-ASCII filenames: a filename split into three numbered RFC 2231 segments with a charset and a language tag, plus size and creation-date parameters. Parsers commonly handle filename*= but not the numbered continuation form.

File
EML · Mime · de
Use case
Email parsingEncoding detection+1· Conversion set
Preview of EML: Second text/plain Part Marked Inline
eml
825 B
Actual file preview for EML: Second text/plain Part Marked Inline

EML: Second text/plain Part Marked Inline

Two text/plain parts inside a mixed container, the second marked inline but carrying a filename. Clients split on this: some concatenate it into the body, some list it as an attachment because a filename is present, and the two behaviours look like different messages.

File
EML · Mime
Use case
Email parsingConversion testing· Conversion set